Tanratanawong, S (2001) A neural network model to forecast construction output in the United Kingdom. PhD thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
A major problem in the construction industry is the high numbers of insolvencies of construction firms. Cyclical fluctuations in construction demand are identified as one of the important causes and, as a result, a number of demand forecasts have been produced to assist firms with their planning processes. However, the forecasts employing traditional approaches have significant drawbacks; qualitative methods are time-consuming and costly to conduct, and forecasts using statistical techniques are often inaccurate. This study aims to improve the efficiency and reliability of the forecasting process. As there are a large number of factors that relate to construction demand and the knowledge of the interrelationships between them is limited, it is very difficult to precisely model the system using traditional techniques. Implementing a more advanced forecasting technique may be a solution for developing effective forecasts. From the problem characteristics, it is obvious that any new, improved technique must be able to cope with a large number of variables that are highly interrelated to each other. Based on this assessment of the problem, neural networks were selected for this study, due to their ability to model implicit functions underlying complicated relationships. Provided an adequate set of historical data can be made available, they can learn and map the relations between various variables without prior knowledge and generalise outputs with relatively high accuracy. The technique was thus adopted, aiming to forecast construction outputs one year ahead in three different construction sectors: housing, non-housing, and repair and maintenance. In addition, two input-filtering techniques were adopted to identify the sets of relevant variables for neural networks: regression analysis' stepwise technique and principal component analysis. These techniques reduced the number of input variables significantly, whilst still permitting the neural network models to perform relatively well in terms of accuracy. From the initial total of 43 economic indicators, the reductions were considerable, with 75% reduction in the case of the stepwise procedure and as much as 86% reduction in the other. The models using principal component analysis, however, performed slightly better than those using regression inputs. When compared to two existing published forecasts performed by experts in the field and using conventional qualitative methods, the results were close in terms of overall accuracy. However, the neural network models outperformed the regression models, which were also produced along side them as the representatives for quantitative methods in the present study.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | United Kingdom; accuracy; construction demand; construction firms; forecasting; neural network; regression analysis; reliability |
| Index terms: | United Kingdom, efficiency, accuracy, insolvency, construction sector, regression model, principal component analysis, construction output, neural network, housing, quantitative method, forecasting, construction industry, economic indicator, construction demand, repair, regression analysis, qualitative method, construction firm, planning process |
| Subjects: | performance management, prediction and forecasting, industry analysis, market analysis, construction type, project controls, artificial intelligence, operations management, statistical analysis, Geography, liability law, professional development, maintenance engineering, organization, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Legal Issues, Time Control, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here