Thuvander, L (2003) Towards environmental informatics for building stocks: A conceptual model for an environmental building stock information system for sustainable development - EBSIS(SD). PhD thesis, Chalmers Tekniska Hogskola, Sweden.
Abstract
The building sector uses a considerable amount of all materials and energy used in Sweden. Knowledge about the existing building stock, its impact on the environment in relation to the use of material and energy, however, is limited and targeted environmental objectives and decision-making are based on vague information. To achieve environmental improvement and to pursue environmental objectives, descriptions of the environmental performance of building stocks are needed in a structured form. In the thesis a conceptual model for a computer-based Environmental Building Stock Information System for Sustainable Development (EBSISSD) is developed and the conditions for establishing such a system are examined. The relevance and feasibility of EBSISSD have been investigated through interview studies and literature studies. Modelling aspects have also been elaborated through studies of state-of-the-art, field trips and test runs of data sets with the City of Göteborg as a case in particular. In terms of modelling, issues regarding time, space and flows and deposits of material, energy and water related to buildings have been formulated. A broad scan of the building stock research field in Sweden and internationally and the environmental informatics field has identified the existing information structures BSAB, SPINE and GIS as the bricks for construction of the EBSISSD database structure. Moreover, a top-down and bottom-up approach is proposed in combination with a spatial age-use matrix. Concerning relevance, several potential users are identified both on the regional and local levels, such as property managers, municipal authorities and researchers. Potential applications comprise benchmarking, planning issues and scenario studies. Concerning feasibility, existing data and data sources are surveyed. The available energy-use data are adequate, whereas the material-use data are less satisfactory. In the Göteborg case study, an energy model based on delivered data is produced that shows the potential of a spatial age-use matrix. In conclusion, it is possible to construct EBSISSD, there are certainly interest groups and data are available. However, it is recommended to develop EBSIS SD in close co-operation with users and to start on the local level.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Sweden; benchmarking; building stock; case study; co-operation; environmental performance; information system; interview; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | bottom-up approach, modelling, benchmarking, information system, case study, sustainable development, environmental performance, Sweden, interview, building stock, state of the art, energy model, informatic, manager, decision-making, interest group, database |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, Geography, urban planning, health safety and environment, analytical methods, data management, sociology, information science, sustainability assessment, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, practitioner, information systems, performance measurement, asset management, energy systems |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Governance, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here