Yearley T, H K B W (2013) Reducing building electricity use by increasing occupant perceived control. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the impacts of increasing the perceived level of control that building users have over the energy performance of a building. The study was conducted at the Student Services Building at the University of Reading in 2009 – 2011. Building occupant perceived control was influenced by engaging the user with high resolution building energy data. Increasing this perceived level of control contributed to overall savings in the building of 25% in small electrical items and lighting. The majority of a building’s carbon emissions are a result of operational activity. Further to this, post occupancy evaluations of new buildings regularly demonstrate that operational energy use and carbon emissions are higher than those quoted during design. A key factor in this design-operation performance gap is the actions of building occupants. Often building occupants are not aware of the level of control they have on the energy performance of the building they occupy. Two behavioural models have been developed that include perceived control as a key factor for enabling and motivating environmental behaviour. Ajzen’s 'Theory of Planned Behaviour' and Stern’s 'Value-Belief-Norm' model demonstrate increases in the amount of influence an individual believes they have over the outcome of a situation will increase their action to make that change.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building users; communication; energy; facilities management; value |
| Index terms: | carbon emission, savings, post-occupancy evaluation, performance gap, planned behaviour, resolution, energy performance, facilities management, perceived control, environmental behaviour, energy use |
| Subjects: | energy systems, economic analysis, evaluation methods, environmental behaviour, climate science, behavioral psychology, conflict resolution, management, performance management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here