A management maturity model (MMM) for project-based organisational performance assessment

Langston, C and Ghanbaripour, A N (2016) A management maturity model (MMM) for project-based organisational performance assessment. Construction Economics and Building, 16(4), pp. 68-85. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

Common sense suggests that organisations are more likely to deliver successful projects if they have systems in place that reflect a mature project environment based on a culture of continuous improvement. This paper develops and discusses a Management Maturity Model (MMM) to assess the maturity of project management organisations through a customisable, systematic, strategic and practical methodology inspired from the seminal work of Darwin, Deming, Drucker and Daniel. The model presented is relevant to organisations, such as construction and engineering companies, that prefer to use the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK™ Guide) published by the Project Management Institute (PMI), but without the disadvantages of excessive time and cost commitments and a 'one size fits all' approach linked to rigid increments of maturity. It offers a game-changing advance in the application of project-based organisational performance assessment compared to existing market solutions that are unnecessarily complex. The feasibility of MMM is field-tested using a medium-sized data centre infrastructure firm in Tehran.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: pmbok; project management; delivery success; organisation maturity modelling
Index terms: organizational performance, maturity model, methodology, project management, Tehran, commitment, modelling, body of knowledge, continuous improvement
Subjects: psychology, analytical methods, knowledge management, research methods, performance measurement, project management theory and practice, evaluation, Geography
Topics: Quality Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here