Usher, D (1990) Privatisation, partnerships and the building industry. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, UK.
Abstract
The 1980s have been characterised by increasing political controversy in Britain. Dominant forces within the Conservative Party began to argue for the reassertion of the pre-eminence of market forces and the restriction of state spending on the social services. Local government in general and housing provision in particular have been opened up to the scrutiny of market forces and competition. This study examines one area of housing privatisation through the sale of council estates to private developers for refurbishment and sale on the open market. The 1980s have witnessed a drastic decline in the level of public housebuilding. This switch in government policy with regard to public housing investment has had a major effect on the organisation and approaches taken by the private sector in the housing production and regeneration process in cities, notably as a result of the changed flow and source of contracts and grant resources for production. Through study of estate sales, two major areas have been explored. Firstly, the perception of the building industry to the curtailment of public housing contracts and the mass privatisation, through a variety of measures, of remaining council stock is examined. In particular, the view that housing regeneration has been impeded where the public sector has "crowded out" the private sector is evaluated. Secondly, the development is significant in the root and branch reform of local govememt where if exemplifies growing centralism over the affairs of democratic local government. In the period 1978-88 central government unleashed sixty legislative Acts onto local government. Combined with an equally broad range of financial cuts there is increasing evidence that the central-local relationship could become one-sided. Consumers have been encouraged to exercise choice but in relation to ability to pay.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competition; government; housebuilding; investment; local government; market; policy; private sector; privatisation; public sector; refurbishment |
| Index terms: | privatization, housebuilding, government policy, building industry, public housing, private sector, partnership, public sector, exercise, housing, housing provision, competition, evidence, local government |
| Subjects: | construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, public policy, economic analysis, market analysis, housing and residential development, construction integration, partnership management, industry analysis, administrative law |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here