Van Zyl, I J (1986) The role of standardization in the building industry. DSc thesis, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract
The need for standardization in South Africa originated with the development of the gold mining industry at the turn of this century. Official recognition and formal development of standardization only came with the establishment of the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) in 1945. Throughout the historic development of standardization, building products were high on the priority list, from which can be deducted that standardization was a necessity. The aim of standardization is to create instruments, such as specifications and codes, for use by the consumer, trade and industry. Standardization in the building industry must also recognize human needs and provide for safety, health and amenity of the occupiers. This can best be achieved by prescribing performance requirements in building standards. The SABS developed a comprehensive set of various building standards. Building regulations are unique to the building industry worldwide. In South Africa building regulations were developed from existing overseas practices, mainly of British origin. National building regulations for mandatory implementation by all local authorities were recently published under the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act, to achieve standardization in this field. A study of the current building regulations in five European countries indicates that these national building regulations are closely allied to their European counterparts. To promote standardization in industrialized building techniques, South Africa has an agrement scheme which is very similar to the agrement schemes found in most countries of Western Europe. With metrication introduced to the South African industry it is obvious to rationalize all dimensions of building materials and products in line with the international system of modular co-ordination. This system offers many advantages to all disciplines involved in the building industry. Most of these indicate towards cost advantages but are not easily quantifiable in every case. In the case of masonry work, demonstrable savings are evident through the use of modular bricks. Modular bricks are not at present generally accepted by local authorities but the proposed national building regulations will legalize their use. It is expected that this will have a beneficial effect on the general acceptance of modular co-ordination and its concomitant benefits.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Europe; South Africa; co-ordination; industrialized building; masonry; safety; standardization; standards |
| Index terms: | South Africa, specification, local authority, building material, mining, building industry, standardization, dimension, implementation, industrialized building, Europe, building regulation, savings |
| Subjects: | physical geography and landforms, Geography, building construction, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, contractual condition, geotechnical engineering, sociology, industry analysis, regulatory law, building materials, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Procurement, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Contract Administration, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here