Zou R R, F R and Jewell C, T L C M (2013) An exploratory study of information maturity in construction and developing a decision-making model. In: Smith, S D and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D D (eds.) Proceedings of 29th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2013, Reading, UK.
Abstract
The efficiency of a design process has a close relationship with effective information management. However, the increasing volume of digital information makes effective information management in design and construction organisations more difficult, in particular in retrieving high value, high quality and, more importantly, “mature” design information when it is needed. There is a need to develop a tool that can assess, or indeed increase, the maturity of any design information for ease of storage, retrieval and reuse with suitable information management tools. The engineering industry has been striving for this for many years, and has been successful in capturing design rationale .Based on a literature review, the aim of this paper is to describe how the concept of capturing design rationale from the engineering industry and its tool called the Design Rationale Editor (DRed) can be incorporated as a new conceptual tool called the DRed-based decision-making model for use in the design stage of construction. It can capture and evaluate design rationale and hence help designers to make better and more effective design decisions through assessing and perhaps increasing the design information maturity. The definition or concept of information maturity in construction has yet to be explored and will form a major part of future work. Future work will be to demonstrate how design information rationale can be captured and edited along the life cycle in the digital environment through the use of real case studies, and to address any issues and limitations on its applications in the industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design; decision-making; information assessment; maturity; modelling |
| Index terms: | efficiency, high-value, design process, case study, literature review, life cycle, designer, exploratory study, decision-making, design stage, design and construction, modelling, design decision |
| Subjects: | performance management, research methods, design practice, decision analysis, profession, data collection methods, value management, design methods, economic analysis, analytical methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, professional practice |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here