Wang, S-Y (2005) Computer experiment for improving construction processes. PhD thesis, Purdue University, USA.
Abstract
From the perspective of flow analysis, the more complex the project, the more wastes are prone to build up, due to the increasing number of interfaces between activities. When processes are further expanded beyond the jobsite to the scale of a supply chain, the complexity is usually beyond human perception. Lean thinking and supply chain management were introduced to the construction industry in hopes of resolving the well-known waste and fragmentation problems. However, the lack of a quantitative approach to analyze the construction processes and to assess the effectiveness of the production strategies before implementation impedes the acceptance of these new production philosophies in construction industry. In order to provide a systematic approach to help management make correct and timely decisions, an analytical method capable of efficiently and economically modeling complicated processes and addressing various managerial questions is necessary. An analytical framework combining simulation, design of experiments, regression analysis, and mathematical programming is proposed to facilitate the optimal design of construction processes under various constraints. The research first uses a simplified concrete delivery process to illustrate how the framework is implemented. The proposed framework is then implemented in two real-world cases (i. e. , the concrete column pouring process and the concrete slab pouring process) to test its validity. The application of this framework to study various lean concepts (such as work flow variability and continuous improvement) is also discussed.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Halpin, D W |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; continuous improvement; experiment; fragmentation; programming; regression analysis; simulation; supply chain management |
| Index terms: | fragmentation, philosophy, design of experiment, column, experiment, analytical framework, complexity, construction process, programming, mathematical programming, continuous improvement, validity, production strategy, modelling, implementation, construction industry, regression analysis, variability, effectiveness |
| Subjects: | performance measurement, performance management, industry analysis, philosophical studies, systems engineering, statistical analysis, data collection methods, business, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, manufacturing engineering, structural engineering, algorithms, building construction, evaluation and assessment methods, programming, contractual arrangements, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here