Wright, J A (2005) An assessment of competitive advantage and market opportunities of UK construction companies operating in Europe. PhD thesis, University of Leeds, UK.
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the mechanism that construction companies adopt to establish a competitive strategic position in order to exploit market opportunities in the construction markets of Europe. An analysis framework of competitive advantages is developed, contenting that such advantage is influenced by technological, organisational and external sources. The mechanisms for exploiting competitive advantage overseas requires the establishment of an appropriate strategy and structure to internationalise a company's capabilities. In the construction industry this may be accomplished by internal structural change, though is more likely to involve the use of strategic alliances, chiefly to overcome barriers and constraints to a firm's pursuing work outside its national border. Methods of market appraisal in construction are heavily dependent on relationships with existing clients and other participants in the industry, placing an emphasis on quality and the level of service provision. A model of the strategic mechanism to exploit competitive advantage, and of the influences on the opportunity to secure favourable market conditions is developed and tested amongst companies in the UK construction industry using Grounded Theory. A semi-structured interview technique is used to study the linkage between the mechanism and opportunity. It is concluded that this linkage establishes the need for differentiation of a firm's offerings through its competitive advantage leading to its target markets. There is also a need for an appropriate structure and overseas configuration to exploit these advantages, and a necessary emphasis on quality and level of service rather than cost in meeting clients needs.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Europe; UK; competitive advantage; differentiation; grounded theory; interview; market; market conditions; markets |
| Index terms: | grounded theory, linkage, strategic alliance, competitive advantage, Europe, markets, construction industry, level of service, construction market, placing, strategy, market condition, construction company, interview, differentiation, appraisal, configuration |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, organization, market analysis, factor and component analysis, physical geography and landforms, theoretical framing, business, data collection methods, economic and policy analysis, partnership management, systems engineering, industry analysis, performance measurement, management, concrete and cementitious materials |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here