A computational model for simulation, visualization and evaluation of mandatory and optional building occupancy scenarios

Zarrinmehr, S (2016) A computational model for simulation, visualization and evaluation of mandatory and optional building occupancy scenarios. PhD thesis, Texas A&M University, USA.

Abstract

Evaluating design decisions is an important factor in a post-positivist design process. Understanding how people move in space is an important part of the evaluation processes. However, making accurate predictions of occupants’ movements is a challenge mainly due to the differences between individual occupants, their unique preferences in relation to environmental qualities, the types of scenarios with which they become engaged, and multiple dimensions of the environmental factors that affect occupants’ decisions. This study suggests a model to simulate and visualize mandatory occupancy scenarios, which are task-based, and optional occupancy scenarios, which are attraction-based. The impact of environmental qualities is largely overlooked in existing simulation models in both of these scenarios. Existing simulation models for mandatory scenarios are often based on finding shortest or fastest paths and for optional scenarios mainly rely on the field of visibility. The original contribution of the simulation models that this study suggests is simultaneous consideration of environmental qualities, path simplicity, and visibility in addition to desires such as travel time or distance minimization. The integration of these models unlocks new potentials that the individual components do not include. The individual techniques that will be used to develop the occupancy simulation models are validated in the exiting literature experimentally. However, this study does not include conducting field studies to validate the integrated model. If the observed walking trails of humans are provided, the suggested models in this study can be validated through a fine-tuning process that reproduces the observed trails. The simulation results can finally be used for evaluation purposes to help designers at the design phase and facility managers in after design phases to make informed decisions. This study provides a software solution that implements the suggested model to support its feasibility. This software uses a Building Information Model (BIM) to represent the built environment, an Agent-Based Model (ABM) to simulate the occupants, a list of research evidence to encode agent’s reactions to the environment, a Discrete Event Simulation (DES) model to represent the tasks in mandatory scenarios, and the field of visibility (isovist) to simulate an occupant’s viewshed. In this software, evaluation is a process of data query from the information collected by the agents during the simulations. The data query logic can be set according to the interests of designers or facility managers.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Clayton, M J and Yan, W
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information model; built environment; integration; occupancy; simulation; visualization
Index terms: dimension, environmental quality, built environment, design phase, designer, discrete event simulation, integrated model, design decision, preference, visualization, agent, environmental factor, evidence, integration, design process, computational model, movement, minimization, manager, field study
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, modelling and simulation, design methods, profession, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, design practice, environmental science, professional practice, analytical methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, sustainability assessment, algorithms, decision-making and reasoning, research methods
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here