Meistad, Torill Randi (2015) Sustainable building: From role model projects to industrial transformation. PhD thesis, Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, Norway.
Abstract
Background and purpose Improving energy efficiency and sustainability is a challenge for the construction industry. The United Nation’s environment programme (UNEP) and the EU’s Energy Performance of Buildings Directive require a change in building practices. The challenge is how to facilitate the transformation. The purpose of this PhD research is to increase the understanding of how the Norwegian construction industry is transforming towards sustainable building. Four issues have been studied in this thesis to provide new knowledge relating to this question, as follows: - Management of innovative energy-efficient building projects - Usability of modern energy-efficient office buildings - The role of facility managers in the planning process of ambitious projects - Mechanisms in the industrial system affecting implementation of sustainable practice Methodology and methods Pioneering projects have proved that an outstanding energy and environmental performance can be achieved on a voluntary basis by owners and industry partners setting themselves ambitious goals. Eight Norwegian so-called role model projects have been studied to explore the processes and effect mechanisms that lead to the extraordinary results. The material includes 55 interviews, observations of buildings when they are being used, project documents and written and oral presentations of the projects. The grounded theory approach has been used to perform case study analysis of this material. Major findings Ambitious tenant organizations represent a pull from the market and a knowledge resource for the development of sustainable buildings. Facility managers are a source of practical experience that feed forward knowledge about the operation and energy performance of existing buildings to new projects. Life cycle cost analysis provides information on long-term operational and maintenance costs, improving communication between property managers and decision makers and contributes to improving economic, community and environmental sustainability. Enthusiasm is a driver for innovation and outstanding performance. Enthusiasm enables experienced owners, project managers and teams to find methods and solutions to bridge system barriers that resist change in industrial practice. R&D partners provide new knowledge and reduce risks in initiatives for innovative sustainable building. Usability is a key to the implementation of sustainable building. This includes area efficiency, an improved indoor climate and aesthetics, and functionality and adaptability for dynamic user organizations. Added value gained from exploring the synergy effects in energy-efficient building concepts is the key to increasing the demand for sustainable buildings from the market. At the moment, immature technology for indoor climate control is hampering the transformation of the construction industry. Value of the research The originality of this research is the analytical approach to sustainable building, namely the organizational dynamics. This approach illustrates how the organizing of relations between individuals in teams and between enterprises in projects affects the result, namely the energy performance of the final buildings. The socio-technical system perspective provides new insight into the interplay between technology and human beings. Existing studies have shown how this interplay affects the actual energy performance of buildings when they are being used. This research adds insight into how management practice affects social processes that are relevant to the final energy performance of the building. And the research adds insight into the competition between existing industrial regimes and the emerging regimes of sustainable building. Conclusions and suggestions Research presented in this thesis can be summarized in four major conclusions: 1. The Norwegian construction industry is able to develop highly sustainable buildings. There are stakeholders within the industry that can be characterized as “innovators” and “early adopters” who explore the potential for nergy efficiency in construction projects. 2. The organizing of the planning and construction process has been decisive for achieving the extraordinary results. Crossing the borders of organizational units, roles and the division of work in various phases has made it possible to pool knowledge, share risks and find innovative solutions to meet new expectations for sustainable building. 3. Currently, buildings with energy and environmental qualities higher than the mandatory technical regulations are exceptions to the rule within the construction industry. Sustainable building is being developed as a niche market. It still remains to be seen whether sustainable building will become standard practice. 4. The role model projects demonstrate that there is a win-win potential in sustainable building: exploring the synergy effects in a search for energy efficiency reveals options for buildings with added value for users and owners as well as the environment and the community. The following are the author’s suggestions for strategies for further development of and transformation towards sustainable building: - To develop building and refurbishment projects as part of a strategic business/organizational plan for the user organization/enterprise. - To arrange for broad participation and early integration in project planning for the purpose of exploring the synergy effects of the energy performance, operation and usability of the final building - To focus on the purpose of the building and the users. This supplements conventional technology orientation in project development. To explore the principles for reflexive governance in a further development of strategies for transformation towards sustainable building. A suggestion for further research is to focus on the implementation of sustainable building concepts and solutions from role models and other niches into ordinary practice in the Norwegian construction industry. Two issues are suggested for further exploration: - Organizational learning from role model projects - Stakeholder benefits from sustainable building – the potential for win-win effects
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Støre-Valen, Marit and Berker, Thomas |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | sustainable building; energy-efficient performance; innovation; project management; integration; collaboration; partnering; transformation |
| Index terms: | transformation, owner, life cycle cost analysis, aesthetic, grounded theory, case study, project manager, role model, sustainable practice, governance, efficiency, partnering, feed forward, environmental performance, added value, planning process, energy efficiency, option, project management, synergy, maintenance cost, implementation, refurbishment project, construction industry, project development, energy performance, energy-efficient building, environmental quality, niche market, social process, dynamics, energy performance of buildings directive, programme, usability, tenant, strategy, functionality, manager, interview, organizational learning, energy efficient office building, building practice, environmental sustainability, project planning, adaptability, documents, socio-technical system, regulation, competition, construction process, sustainable building, integration, methodology, management practice, exploration, collaboration, construction project, indoor climate |
| Subjects: | production management, sustainable design, health safety and environment, infrastructure engineering, sustainable construction, sustainability assessment, theoretical framing, factor and component analysis, research methods, communities and social development, market analysis, building construction, environmental law, practitioner, user focus, environmental science, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, environmental resource management, design features, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, financial management, energy efficiency, economics, performance management, industry analysis, political science, systems engineering, partnership management, organizational analysis, project controls, sustainable practices, sociology, decision analysis, control systems, data collection methods, profession, business, user-centered design, energy systems, project delivery, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Legal Issues, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here