Oo, B L; Nguyen, A T; Ahn, Y and Lim, B T H (2025) Predicting the number of bidders in construction competitive bidding using explainable machine learning models. Construction Innovation, 25(7), pp. 158-188. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The number of bidders in upcoming tenders has important managerial implications for both construction clients and contractors in their decision-making in the competitive bidding process. However, there is a stagnation of research efforts on predicting the number of bidders with only a handful of studies over the past decades, which mainly focused on statistical distribution of the number of bidders. This study aims to provide a new perspective of predicting the number of bidders using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted a case study approach with a bidding dataset of public sector construction projects in Singapore. Six ML models were developed, and linear regression was used as a baseline model is assessing the predictive performance of ML models. Findings: The results show that ML models outperform the baseline linear regression model, in which XGBoost is the best performing model of R2 which is two times higher than the linear regression model. In addition, economic-related factors play a vital role in this prediction problem. Research limitations/implications: While the predictive performance of the developed ML models is relatively low, it indicates the challenges and complexities in this prediction problem, even with the use of artificial intelligent techniques. Originality/value: Being a pioneering work, this study sets a foundation for the use of ML models in this prediction problem and offers insights for future modelling attempts towards the development of a decision support system for construction clients and contractors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; construction; construction bidding; digitalization; machine learning; number of bidders; prediction; procurement; tendering |
| Index terms: | number of bidders, competitive bidding, decision support, digitalization, decision-making, methodology, construction project, machine learning, dataset, complexity, bidding, Singapore, regression model, case study, public sector, construction client, modelling |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, data collection methods, statistical analysis, systems engineering, administrative law, decision analysis, data management, analytical methods, bidding, digital technology, practitioner, Geography, production management, research methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Procurement, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here