Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential developmentSpatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development

Talvitie, I; Amiri, A and Junnila, S (2024) Spatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential developmentSpatiotemporal evaluation of embodied carbon in urban residential development. Buildings & Cities, 5(1), pp. 704-722. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

The building sector emits over one-third of anthropogenic global greenhouse gas emissions annually. New construction alone threatens to consume the remainder of existing carbon budgets. Therefore, immediate actions are urgently required to mitigate these emissions. The current urban planning paradigm favours densification. However, it remains unclear how densification policies have influenced the embodied carbon emissions (EC) of new residential developments. This study evaluates residential development trends and associated EC across six urban regions in Finland between 2000 and 2021. Quantitative methods are used to compare and assess comprehensive building data with state-of-the-art whole-life carbon data. Although densification in many Finnish urban environments has reduced floor area per capita, it has also increased EC intensity in residential development by 5–10%. Spatial analysis further reveals that higher average emissions intensities occur in areas of high-volume development. These higher EC intensities are attributable to changes in housing construction and a corresponding decline in timber construction. POLICY RELEVANCE As a significant portion of emissions is already generated before a new building is even in use, future policies must account for the temporal impact of EC from new construction activities. Given their substantial authority over land-use governance, municipalities need policies to reduce the environmental burden of new construction. These policies include assigning carbon limits for all new buildings and mandating quotas for low-carbon construction material use in new zoning plans. Municipalities should also more actively enforce mandates for low-carbon construction before land leases or transfers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biogenic carbon; climate mitigation; densification; embodied carbon; Finland; residential development; timber construction; urban development; urban planning
Index terms: densification, Finland, construction activity, governance, lease, land, residential development, residential construction, urban development, mandate, embodied carbon, urban environment, municipality, urban planning, quantitative method, low-carbon construction, state of the art, zoning, mitigation, timber construction, greenhouse gas emission, urban planning paradigm
Subjects: design practice, construction integration, administrative law, environmental health, political science, business, urban sustainability, real estate economics, sustainability and energy, data analysis and analytics, economic development, land economics, Geography, urban design, financial risk, research dissemination and communication, environmental impact, urban planning, construction operations
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Site Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here