Cotella, V A; Neagu, C D; Bavani, S A; Trichard, M; Horcholle, F; Sangoï, R; Lacalle, C; Jeanvoine, A; Sparrow, T and Wilson, A S (2025) Optimising 3D point cloud semantic segmentation: ML and manual refinement in the unesco saltaire village. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 846-870. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds has been an ongoing challenge in recent years. The present research focuses on refining existing standalone Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to enhance their performance in segmenting mid-19th-century industrial housing architectural components, drawing on the UNESCO World Heritage Site Saltaire Industrial Village. Its architecture is actively influenced by contemporary human activity, introducing complexities into the original fabric and spatial composition. This research provides methodological insights into optimising segmentation performance through a combination of pragmatically reviewed ML classification techniques and manual refinement strategies. The methodology is based on two classification methods: Standalone ML and Multilayer ML. For the first time, this study provides detailed evidence of the challenges encountered in transitioning from traditional human-led models to HBIM in densely altered heritage environments. Results evaluate the performance of each method with the final aim of laying the groundwork for a semi-automated AI-backed scan-to-BIM approach for 19th-century architecture, contributing to a deeper understanding of its unique characteristics and supporting a sustainable transition to robust HBIM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | 3D point cloud; cultural heritage; heritage building information modelling; industrial architecture; machine learning; semantic segmentation |
| Index terms: | drawing, point cloud, strategy, heritage building, evidence, methodology, complexity, housing, machine learning, information modelling, multilayer, human activity, UNESCO |
| Subjects: | sociology, systems engineering, specialized materials and systems, management, technical documentation, institutional frameworks, artificial intelligence, research methods, digital design, evaluation and assessment methods, construction type |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Governance, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here