Roffe, M and Trop, T (2025) Willingness to purchase and to pay a price premium for apartments with exterior green walls. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 892-911. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Despite the well-documented benefits of exterior green walls (GWs), their adoption in the housing market remains limited. This study constitutes the first empirical investigation into the willingness of prospective homebuyers to purchase newly built apartments featuring a hydroponic living wall, the price premium (PP) they are willing to pay and the factors influencing their motivation. Based on an online survey among a nationally representative sample of Israeli adults, findings reveal that despite 84% being unfamiliar with GWs, 63% expressed interest in living in a GW-integrated building and were willing to pay an average PP exceeding 5%. This may reflect a general openness to innovative and sustainable architectural trends, despite limited prior knowledge. Key positive predictors of willingness to pay (WTP) included awareness of GW benefits, engagement in environmental activities and installation grants. Aesthetic enhancement, thermal performance, educational value, perceived innovation and property marketability benefits also had significant positive effects. In contrast, concerns about potential nuisances emerged as the primary barrier. Sociodemographic influences were limited, with only gender and income showing significance–females and lower-income individuals reported higher WTP. The study highlights the market readiness for GW adoption and offers a foundation for targeted policy and outreach efforts to enhance uptake.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | exterior green walls; hydroponic living wall; price premium; willingness to pay |
| Index terms: | aesthetic, investigation, income, willingness to pay, survey, motivation, thermal performance, nuisance, housing |
| Subjects: | construction type, psychology, economic analysis, factor and component analysis, data collection methods, energy systems, regulatory law, price determination |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Legal Issues, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here