Fahrich, R; Schumann, L; Kremser, L; Schmitt, L and Kriegel, M (2025) Building energy efficiency assessment considering IEQ and sustainability certification data for German office buildings. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 912-928. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Assessing a building’s energy efficiency is a major goal to avoid unnecessary and inefficient energy-consuming renovations. Currently, building energy efficiency is measured primarily by the energy demand of the building. However, the higher energy efficiency of the building is not always aligned with the greater comfort of the occupant, which is the main benefit a building provides. In this study, indoor environmental quality (IEQ) ratings and building energy demand are considered together to evaluate building energy efficiency. It compares the IEQ comfort achieved to the energy demand of the building. An example IEQ index calculation based on certification data of two buildings assessed by a German building sustainability certification system is used. The data include scoring of different IEQ categories and information on energy usage for the buildings. In addition, a survey on IEQ factors was conducted among building users and the results were compared to those based on the certification assessment data. The IEQ rating of the building certification data based on building design and measurement data for the individual factors differed from the subject study results by up to 50%. The overall performance of the considered buildings ranged from 0.13 to 0.16 IEQ-Score per MJ m−2 a−1 for the certification data and survey results.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building performance; energy demand; indoor environmental quality; subject study; sustainability certification; thermal comfort |
| Index terms: | building sustainability, renovation, indoor environmental quality, comfort, thermal comfort, building design, energy efficiency, energy demand, office building, certification, building performance, survey |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, architectural design, construction type, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, environmental engineering, administrative processes, renovation and retrofit, sustainability and energy, energy systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here