Oladiran, O; Hallam, P and Westlake, H (2025) Are the COVID-19 footprints fading? Analysing dynamics in work, corporate real estate strategies and building use. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 929-947. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
Sentiments about hybrid working have changed in line with the waning of the Covid-19 pandemic. Businesses and organizations are increasingly driving a return-to-office (RTO) mandate, which questions previous perceptions about reimagining office space use and the ESG and economic impacts at the pandemic apex. Using data from two waves of Knight Frank's (Y)OUR SPACE survey (2021 and 2023), we employ probit models to analyse the link between the COVID-19 pandemic and workspace dynamics. We also compare the influence of business strategies and work patterns on office space use expectations during the lockdown and 2 years after. The results indicate that the COVID-19-driven hybrid working led to firms’ decisions to reduce their office space quantity while improving the quality of space. However, these sentiments and expectations are changing in line with post-pandemic work culture and organizational strategies. Our results further reveal that office space flexibility may not be a priority in organizations’ future workspace strategy. These insights indicate that economic factors remain core priorities in future workspace strategies while environmental and social factors remain secondary. This study extends the literature beyond the economic drivers of workspace strategies to environmental and social factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ESG; office; organizational strategy; real estate; return to office; work from home |
| Index terms: | business strategy, strategy, survey, COVID-19, organizational strategy, mandate, economic impact, workspace, social factor, office space, pandemic, economic factor, real estate, dynamics, corporate real estate |
| Subjects: | construction type, strategic management, financial analysis, economic concepts, real estate economics, business, data collection methods, political science, systems engineering, sociology, health risk and incident analysis, management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here