Living with extreme heat: Perceptions and experiences

King, L and Demski, C (2025) Living with extreme heat: Perceptions and experiences. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 527-543. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Climate change is increasing global temperatures, leading to periods of extreme heat in temperate regions, e.g. in the UK. Cooling can mitigate the impacts of heat, with air-conditioning (AC) widely considered the most effective solution. A projected rise in extreme heat events in temperate climates is likely to trigger a growth in AC uptake, with negative implications for carbon emissions and inequality. Research on how heat is experienced and perceived in temperate climates is limited. Such insights are essential for adapting to and mitigating rising temperatures and developing resilient futures. A study of urban residents (n = 40) in South West England assesses their experiences of heat based on their visual narratives and interviews. Cultural narratives of heat are inherently positive yet contrast with negative experiences. Managing heat is framed as an individual responsibility and mediated through patterns of consumption, social and structural contexts. AC is increasingly becoming normalised as a solution to future extreme heat, with implications for energy use and cooling pathways. To disrupt unsustainable pathways, initiatives and policy should leverage experiential learning to legitimise risks, emphasise impacts, and support passive and sustainable cooling.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; air-conditioning; behaviour; cooling; heat protection; heat resilience; heatwave; overheating; thermal comfort
Index terms: experiential learning, interview, overheating, narrative, climate change, consumption, heatwave, carbon emission, becoming, England, adaptation, extreme heat, thermal comfort, inequality, energy use
Subjects: philosophical process, Geography, consumer economics, climate science, user focus, thermal systems, environmental engineering, sociology, qualitative and interpretive research, energy systems, learning methods, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Geographical Context, Education, Ethics, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here