Järvelä, H; Lehto, A; Pirilä, T and Kuittinen, M (2025) Metrics for building component disassembly potential: A practical framework. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 634-653. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Reduction of virgin building material resources through design for disassembly (DfD) is pivotal in transitioning into a low-carbon, circular construction. However, the lack of standardised, quantifiable disassembly potential (DP) assessment methods presents a challenge for the broader adoption of reuse practical applications. Most widely referenced existing DP assessment methods are not applicable in early building-design phases, as they require detailed information typically not available until later design phases. As a result, it is challenging to conduct DP assessment in parallel with life-cycle assessment that must be started early on to ensure that a building’s carbon footprint will not exceed a limit value. The relevance for new quantifiable, holistic methods is highlighted in the existing literature. A novel streamlined method is presented for assessing buildings’ DP based on the quantities of building materials, and their distribution to structures and assemblies. The findings indicate that a material layer-dependent assessment of DP offers advantages over existing methods. PRACTICE RELEVANCE A more accessible, scalable and reliable DP assessment framework is essential for reducing demolition waste, extending material life-cycles, and cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with future building component production. To maximise GHG reductions, DfD should be considered from the early design phases. The findings indicate that the developed DP assessment method aligns more closely with expert assessment than existing methods, while remaining streamlined. Additionally, three case studies are evaluated to ensure the proposed method’s feasibility and demonstrate its results. By integrating DfD considerations into the early design process, the construction industry can advance towards more circular and resource-efficient practices, ultimately reducing the environmental impact of the built environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; connection; design for disassembly; disassembly potential; life-cycle assessment |
| Index terms: | circular economy, carbon footprint, case study, construction industry, design for disassembly, building material, design phase, built environment, design process, disassembly, demolition waste, building component, greenhouse gas, environmental impact |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, building materials, sustainability and energy, data collection methods, design methods, architectural elements, sustainable design, operations management, professional practice, waste management, environmental impact, climate science |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Site Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here