Kilpeläinen, S; Pelsmakers, S; Castaño-Rosa, R and Miettinen, M S (2025) Exploring diverse drivers behind hybrid heating solutions. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 580-596. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
How do individuals reflect on and relate to hybrid heating arrangements and the ‘stacking’ of heating modes in their home? Drawing on a set of oral histories (n = 110) collected in Finland, inhabitants’ long-standing engagement with versatile heating arrangements is explored. This is not a novel phenomenon but one that has evolved over time. The reasons and motivations for stacking of heating modes is situated in the themes of preparedness, thermal delight, everyday activities and the environment. In addition, the main drawbacks of hybrid heating systems, including financial limitations and hybridity as a tool to alleviate energy vulnerability pressures, are analysed. This nuanced perspective on heating transitions illustrates heating transitions as complex, contextual processes that are constantly negotiated at the level of the dwelling. As a hybrid system, it combines both technologies and everyday activities flexibly. Leveraging experiences with hybridity in domestic heating requires a holistic understanding and is crucial for the development of sustainable heating futures. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Domestic heating systems have been shaped by hybridity in the Finnish context. New insights are provided on the drivers behind individuals’ engagement with hybrid heating systems: the key role played by thermal delight and everyday activities, as well as the drawbacks of hybrid heating systems. This can support a more nuanced debate on how best to utilise existing hybrid heating systems and support the development of new hybrid solutions in the home. Hybridity should be included as a key component in facilitating sustainable and inclusive domestic heating transitions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | domestic heating; Finland; heating systems; heating transition; homes; hybrid heating; inhabitants; space heating; thermal comfort; thermal delight |
| Index terms: | thermal comfort, space heating, Finland, domestic heating, heating system, drawing, stacking, hybrid system, history, vulnerability, motivation |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, Geography, systems and processes, environmental engineering, psychology, mechanical systems, technical documentation, energy systems, architectural and construction history, environmental hazards |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here