Modelling site-specific outdoor temperature for buildings in urban environments

Cebrat, K; Narożny, J; Baborska-Narozny, M and Smektała, M (2025) Modelling site-specific outdoor temperature for buildings in urban environments. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 490-510. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Building performance simulations often rely on standardised meteorological datasets, which may not accurately reflect urban microclimates. This study highlights the complexity of temperature dynamics near buildings influenced by multiple factors. A static correction factor is unfeasible for adjusting meteorological data from suburban stations to city centres. To address this, air temperature variability in different urban locations was analysed using data from a city-centre weather station, 32 facade-mounted sensors and thermographic imaging. The selected locations for analysis are representative of approximately 25% of the housing stock in Wrocław, Poland. This was compared with standard meteorological data from Wrocław II, located at an airport. These analyses formed the basis for developing a predictive machine-learning model to account for thermal variability based on building type, location, facade orientation and facade materials. Focusing on the summer period to assess nocturnal cooling potential, the model achieved high accuracy, with R² > 0.93 in training and 0.92 in validation. These findings underscore the need for microclimate-informed meteorological adjustments in building simulations. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Implementing corrections to outdoor temperature in urban environments can significantly enhance the accuracy of energy modelling, particularly for natural ventilation strategies addressing urban overheating. However, due to the complexity of temperature dynamics near buildings, defining a single static correction factor for climate parameters such as temperature is unlikely to be effective. Analysis indicates that even multiple regression approaches result in correction factors that are difficult to apply in practice. Adjustments must be determined separately for facade orientation, building height, external wall structure and urban location. The proposed method enables the generation of dynamic, high-spatial-resolution temperature data, incorporating facade orientation and specific building floor heights. These refined datasets can be used to adjust meteorological station measurements, improving the accuracy of simulations. When applied to a typical meteorological year dataset, this approach may offer a way to better represent thermal variability in urban environments, supporting more context-sensitive building-energy modelling.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building morphology; building performance simulation; machine-learning model; natural ventilation; Poland; thermal variability; urban microclimate; urban morphology
Index terms: city centre, dynamics, urban morphology, housing stock, overheating, modelling, strategy, natural ventilation, microclimate, summer, variability, energy modelling, dataset, resolution, meteorological data, building floor, urban environment, building height, multiple-regression, complexity, validation, weather, building performance simulation, air temperature, accuracy, Poland, building morphology, building simulation
Subjects: architectural elements, design theory, management, statistical analysis, thermal systems, climate science, urban sustainability, data management, building performance, systems engineering, sustainability and energy, conflict resolution, air quality, data collection methods, Geography, infrastructure and transport systems, professional development, modelling and simulation, environmental engineering, urban form and morphology, analytical methods, industry analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here