Panahi, B; Moezzi, E; Preece, C N and Zakaria, W N W (2016) Personal-organisational value conflicts and job satisfaction of internal construction stakeholders. Construction Economics and Building, 16(1), pp. 1-17. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
This paper concerns the issue of value conflicts in construction organizations. This research was conducted in the Malaysian construction industry to fill the gap in the knowledge in areas of organizational behaviour in the construction industry in terms of the possible effects of conflicts on the job satisfaction of internal construction stakeholders. The conflicts considered are those rooted in differences between personal and organizational values. This research targeted professional project consultants identified as architects, engineers, and quantity surveyors as the internal construction stakeholders in Malaysia. The personal-organizational values and the level of job satisfaction of the stakeholders were assessed using a questionnaire survey. To achieve the research objective, comparative and hierarchical regression analyses were performed. The results generated by the analyses indicated a high level of value conflicts in the construction organizations which significantly and negatively affected job satisfaction of the internal stakeholders. Therefore this research, through investigating the potential effect of value conflicts on the stakeholders' job satisfaction, reveals the importance of the interaction between personal and organizational values in construction organizations which contributes to the extant literature of organizational behaviour in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | personal values; conflict; internal construction stakeholders; job satisfaction; organizational values |
| Index terms: | organizational behaviour, regression analysis, organizational value, job satisfaction, survey, construction industry, interaction, engineer, questionnaire, personal value, architect, Malaysia, internal construction stakeholder, quantity surveying, construction organization |
| Subjects: | profession, management, data collection methods, organization, business, Geography, sociology, industry analysis, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here