Ramani, P V and Akomah, B B (2025) The negative factors that influence the performance of Ghanaian construction projects. Construction Economics and Building, 25(2), pp. 112-142. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Numerous factors affect the performance of construction projects. The goal of this paper is twofold: first, to identify and determine the negative factors influencing construction projects, and second, to specify the hypothesised causal relations between the observed and hidden variables using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model. A deductive research approach and a cross-sectional design method were chosen for the study. A literature review was first conducted, and 66 negative variables were identified. The factors were modified and designed into a questionnaire for data collection. The Cronbach alphas of the three components indicate a high degree of internal consistency. The measurement variables adequately measure the negative factor construct. In addition, the fit indices suggest that the postulated model sufficiently describes the dataset. Poor environmental practices (PAS2), inadequate environmental legislative framework to address modern environmental concerns in the delivery of construction projects (PAS1), and non-inclusion of occupational health and safety in contracts (PAS3) were identified as three relevant negative factors impacting project performance. The paper identified poor assessment strategies, weak management systems, and inefficient regulatory systems as the significant latent factors that affect performance. According to the findings, a poor assessment strategy is more consequential. The results of the study suggest that poor assessment strategies, weak management systems, and inefficient regulatory systems can lead to worsening health and safety conditions in the construction industry, as well as environmental violations and poor environmental practices. The government should enact adequate health and safety and environmental and local community protection laws to protect the environment and local communities during construction. Clients must liaise with consultants to incorporate sufficient health and safety clauses into construction contracts and ensure judicious compliance by contractors. To reduce corruption in the construction sector, the government should strengthen its anti-corruption mechanisms.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project performance; impact; multivariate analysis; negative factors |
| Index terms: | project performance, construction contract, design method, construction industry, environmental concern, construction project, questionnaire, corruption, construction sector, dataset, violation, compliance, management system, health and safety, regulatory system, multivariate analysis, strategy, literature review, occupational health and safety, confirmatory factor analysis |
| Subjects: | management, project management theory and practice, occupational health and safety management, data management, statistical analysis, political science, industry analysis, regulatory law, data collection methods, design methods, data analysis and analytics, health safety and environment, production management, professional ethics, contract type, environmental issues |
| Topics: | Governance, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Project Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here