Tharun, T; Thounaojam, N; Devkar, G and Laishram, B (2025) Proactive contract theory-based resilience framework development for public-private partnerships. Construction Economics and Building, 25(2), pp. 253-275. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Public–private partnerships (PPPs) are long-term contracts spanning many decades and are susceptible to failure due to dynamic changes such as crises within the contract period. The impending need to incorporate resilience to sustain the impacts of unexpected events on projects and contractual structures compelled this review of the PPP literature. This is to understand and unravel how and in what manner PPPs are undergirded by resilience. Using a systematic literature review methodology, a critical search from 1997 to 2023 for relevant publications in the Scopus and Web of Science databases yielded 71,601 papers. Further screening using filtering criteria and selection from 12 leading journals in PPP studies resulted in a final set of 116 publications, which were then analysed using NVivo. This analysis led to the organisation of contained knowledge to form a resilience framework based on proactive-preventive contract theory. The findings revealed that the primary layer of resilience focuses on keeping the cause of the problem from arising in the first place through flexible contract mechanisms, concession period optimisation, and governance strategies; the secondary resilience intends to interrupt the cause and effect through revenue guarantee options, financial viability and capital structure, and risk allocation and management; and the tertiary resilience is about minimising the damage of any unwanted occurrences such as crisis through conflict and resolution mechanisms and the renegotiation framework. This review synthesised the accumulated PPP resilience knowledge to be used by practitioners while handling the projects—both procured and in pipeline—through the reviewed suggestions and strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | proactive-preventive contract theory; public-private partnerships; resilience, COVID-19 |
| Index terms: | systematic literature review, concession period, pipeline, journal, partnership, governance, practitioner, guarantee, strategy, financial viability, option, resolution, screening, publication, tertiary, science, COVID-19, contract theory, framework development, capital structure, revenue, methodology, risk allocation, database |
| Subjects: | business, conflict resolution, practitioner, curriculum development, research methods, specialized education, decision analysis, contractual arrangements, partnership management, data management, management, contract structure, business management, financial risk, health risk and incident analysis, legal systems, research evaluation and metrics, research dissemination and communication, infrastructure and transport systems, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Procurement, Cost Management, Education, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Governance, Risk Management, Information Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here