al-Attar, H; Sweis, G; Tarawneh, B; Abu-Khader, W; Haddad, L and Sweis, R (2025) Enhanced construction project duration estimation using artificial neural networks: Initial design and planning stages. Construction Economics and Building, 25(2), pp. 168-191. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Maintaining efficiency and quality control during the early phases of construction projects depends on accurate duration estimation. However, because there is not enough data available in the initial stages of project planning, traditional methodologies suffer. To address these challenges, this study presents an innovative approach using artificial neural networks (ANNs) through Python. This method offers reliable predictions for early-stage duration estimation. ANN models were created and validated with 53 design parameters using data from 100 different construction projects in Jordan. Furthermore, the study refined the models to 43 parameters using a questionnaire-driven approach. The average duration estimation accuracy of the ANN models was 90% during the initial stage and 95% during the planning stage, demonstrating their great accuracy. Its uniqueness comes in its application of ANN to early-stage building, an area that has not been extensively studied in the literature to date, and in its demonstration that reliable predictions may be generated in the absence of abundant data. This study demonstrates ANN's effectiveness in enhancing early-stage construction planning by providing stakeholders with a more accurate duration estimation tool than traditional methods. The findings contribute significantly to improving decision-making and project planning in the early phases.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial neural networks; design; duration; Jordan; planning |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, decision-making, methodology, construction project, project planning, accuracy, artificial neural network, effectiveness, construction planning, quality control, duration, Jordan, efficiency, estimation, design parameter |
| Subjects: | production management, Geography, research methods, design constraints, professional development, performance management, decision analysis, project controls, control systems, data collection methods, financial and cost management, project delivery, construction planning, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Risk Management, Design Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here