Savikko, H; Hokkanen, J; Metsäranta, H; Honkatukia, J; Haapanen, M; Tohmo, T and Pongrácz, E (2025) A methodological framework to assess the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction. Construction Economics and Building, 25(2), pp. 143-167. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The aim of this study was to suggest a methodological evaluation framework for assessing the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction. The applicability and usability of different ex-ante employment impact assessment methods were evaluated. Commonly, the employment impacts during construction are used as a justification for investment decisions. In this study, we tested three commonly used methods to estimate the employment impacts during the construction of three real-life case studies and compared the results to the known impacts of these projects. The results indicate that transport infrastructure construction is not an effective means of employment policy nationwide. This is partly due to insufficient labor supply in the infrastructure engineering and construction industries. A higher employment rate on a national level would require an increase in labor supply instead of an increase in labor demand. However, even though the national net impact on employment was close to zero, the gross regional impact on employment would still be useful information in project planning. The methodological framework, presented in this paper, helps to manage the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction in a proper context.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | employment effects; employment evaluation framework; employment policy; impact assessment; infrastructure construction |
| Index terms: | transport infrastructure, usability, evaluation, project planning, infrastructure construction, impact assessment, labour supply, employment, case study, investment decision, estimate, construction industry |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, data collection methods, user-centered design, value management, control systems, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, management, civil engineering, economic analysis, labour economics |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here