Sustainability transitions in infrastructure: Understanding causal dynamics in the Dutch asphalt paving sector

Ruiz, A; Vinke-De Kruijf, J; Santos, J; Volker, L and Dorée, A (2025) Sustainability transitions in infrastructure: Understanding causal dynamics in the Dutch asphalt paving sector. Construction Management and Economics, 43(10), pp. 794-822. ISSN 0144-6193

Abstract

Recognizing that sustainability transitions are often impeded by complex social and institutional factors, this study aims to identify systemic barriers that hinder the scaling up of sustainable innovations in the Dutch asphalt paving sector and the causal dynamics that shape these barriers. Using a single-case study approach, we develop a causal loop diagram (CLD) based on data from 19 semi-structured interviews with key actors, selected through snowball sampling. Through this analysis, we identified three key clusters of systemic barriers: 1) project-centric loops, reflecting the dominant project-focused perspective in business models in the sector; 2) conservative mindset loops, linked to the risk-averse mindset in the sector; and 3) collective knowledge-building loops, which highlight gaps in information exchange, monitoring, and knowledge sharing. Our findings show that a lack of collective knowledge is a core barrier, manifesting in interconnected challenges such as misinformed policies and requirements. We propose practical interventions, including mandating environmental cost indicators, developing testing lanes, supporting independent testing organizations, and creating specialized innovation roles. This study provides actionable insights for public organizations, market parties, and third-sector actors to manage infrastructure projects in ways that promote alignment with long-term sustainability goals.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: asphalt paving; causal loop diagrams; innovation; socio-technical systems; sustainability; transitions
Index terms: information exchange, interview, infrastructure project, scaling, mindset, case study, dynamics, business model, paving, testing, monitoring, knowledge sharing, socio-technical system, sampling
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, data science, knowledge management, theoretical framing, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, systems engineering, control systems, transportation engineering, professional practice, business, organization
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here