A hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach to COQ optimization

Sharma, N; Sood, R and Laishram, B (2025) A hybrid PLS-SEM-ANN approach to COQ optimization. Construction Management and Economics, 43(11), pp. 938-960. ISSN 0144-6193

Abstract

Construction industry faces challenges in making objective decisions due to the complex financial implications of quality management systems (QMS). To address these, QMS integrates cost of quality (COQ), a strategy derived from the manufacturing industry. However, accurately estimating hidden factors (HF) required for COQ design and execution remains a major challenge, impacting visible factors (VF). Therefore, a conceptual model is developed to overcome such challenges by transforming traditional categories of COQ and analyzing the interrelationships between these aspects through the perspective of complexity theory. Data was gathered from 142 quality experts through purposive sampling and a semi-structured questionnaire. A two-stage analysis was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) to address both linear and non-linear regression. The proposed relationships were statistically significant, as assessed through the PLS-SEM model. Additionally, ANN analysis further elucidated these findings, indicating that internal failure (HF) represents the strongest predictor in achieving optimal quality, followed by prevention (HF), and external failure (HF). In contrast, both external failure (HF) and preventive actions (HF) were found to have a comparatively lesser impact. The study identified compensatory, non-compensatory, linear, and non-linear relationships among HF, VF, and quality, and advancing effective QMS strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cost of quality; predictive modelling; quality management
Index terms: complexity, estimating, partial least square, questionnaire, artificial neural network, face, manufacturing industry, structural equation modelling, strategy, predictive modelling, prevention, quality management, construction industry, purposive sampling, quality management system
Subjects: research methods, financial risk, quality assurance, psychology, management, industry analysis, systems engineering, statistical analysis, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, project delivery, financial and cost management, prediction and forecasting
Topics: Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here