Strategic programmes for circular construction: Lessons from three public clients

Eikelenboom, M; van Uden, M; Coenen, T B J and Vosman, L (2025) Strategic programmes for circular construction: Lessons from three public clients. Construction Management and Economics, 43(11), pp. 901-921. ISSN 0144-6193

Abstract

Strategic programmes are frequently employed by organisations to drive transformational change, particularly when sectors pursue systemic shifts, such as the circularity transition. However, despite their potential, these programmes often fail to effect lasting change within their parent organisations, with outcomes remaining disconnected. This study examines how programme integration mechanisms shape organisational transformation in circularity-oriented change programmes. Several mechanisms were identified through a comparative case study of Dutch public construction clients. The findings suggest that isolating such programmes from the parent organisation hinders organisational transformation. Instead, the early incorporation of integration mechanisms is essential to facilitate both learning and unlearning processes, ensuring the effective and sustainable adoption of circular practices. Moreover, findings show that temporal alignment emerges as a decisive factor in a programme's transformative capacity, as mismatches between programme and organisational learning trajectories can limit systemic impact. These insights contribute to strategic programme literature by demonstrating how these programmes can, depending on their formal and informal mechanisms, promote or stall transformative change.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change program; circular economy; infrastructure; organizational transformation; public clients
Index terms: programme, integration, program, public client, transformation, organizational learning, public construction, case study, circular economy, mismatch, circularity
Subjects: business, engineering problems, sustainable materials, professional development, organizational analysis, software systems, building construction, sociology, sustainable design, project controls, data collection methods
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Time Control, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here