Marion, G L C; Saurin, T A and Viana, D D (2025) The cost-benefit of slack in production planning and control in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics, 43(11), pp. 883-900. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
Production planning and control (PP&C) in construction projects addresses a wide diversity of variabilities that must be matched by a corresponding wide diversity of controls. These diverse controls might be accounted for by the concept of slack practices and resources (SPR), an extension of the buffer concept. Decision-making on the allocation of SPR often occurs under time pressure and without monetary data, demanding a suitable analytical approach. This paper introduces a method for assessing the cost-benefit of SPR in PP&C in construction. The method includes a questionnaire designed to be answered by practitioners involved in the creation of SPR. It enables the assessment of the net benefit value of each SPR, which - along with other data (e.g. monetary costs, if available) and consideration of contextual factors - supports decision-making regarding resource allocation. The application of the method in a construction project revealed 15 SPR, 11 of which should be maintained as they were. This suggests that the unstructured decision-making by employees was often effective, though not always. The findings also led to five propositions that guide the method's application, emphasizing the cost-benefit of opportunistic SPR, the different perspectives on SPR allocation, and the value of human-based slack.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buffers; cost-benefit; production planning and control; slack; variability |
| Index terms: | buffer, variability, resource allocation, questionnaire, practitioner, construction project, decision-making, production planning, slack |
| Subjects: | financial risk, production management, practitioner, operations research, decision analysis, statistical analysis, data collection methods, resource management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here