An, X; Zheng, F; Wang, Z; Li, Z; Jiao, Y and An, H (2025) Dynamic risk assessment approach for deep foundation pit construction based on the integration of multisource data using D-S evidence theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(10): 04025155, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction of deep foundation pits is exposed to high risk considering the complexity of geological conditions and surrounding environments, and prompt risk assessment plays an important role in safe construction and management. A novel dynamic risk assessment approach based on the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is proposed to promote efficient assessment of construction risk with the multisource data of different stages. The risk index system is designed extensible and updated with the changing data types at different construction stages. With the D-S evidence theory and the measurement of Euclidean distance, the key factors including basic probability assignments and indicator weights are calculated dynamically. Based on the evaluated risk results, a novel risk control simulation algorithm is proposed to provide risk control suggestions for decision-making. The proposed approach was incorporated into the collapse risk assessment module of the construction information management system for Wuhan Metro Line 12. The risk assessments of Zhongyilu Station show the risks in the four construction stages were all Level I (negligible risk) and verified by the in situ conditions. The robustness of the presented approach was demonstrated by a following Monte Carlo simulation, and a case study of the collapse accident in Xianghu Station validated the feasibility of providing useful risk control suggestions. The presented approach facilitates dynamic and efficient risk evaluation of deep foundation excavation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | D-S evidence theory; deep foundation pit; dynamic risk assessment; multi-source data; risk control; risk index system |
| Index terms: | construction stages, module, risk assessment, in-situ, Monte Carlo simulation, case study, complexity, excavation, evidence, integration, decision-making, management system |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, project delivery, modelling and simulation, management, systems engineering, organizational analysis, decision analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, construction operations, financial risk, architectural elements, building construction |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here