A project scheduling optimization model for reducing construction dust emissions based on variability in meteorological conditions

Li, Y; Zhang, L; Liu, X and Li, X (2025) A project scheduling optimization model for reducing construction dust emissions based on variability in meteorological conditions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(11): 04025171, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Dust emissions from construction activities are one of the main sources of atmospheric particulate pollution, which can pose serious health risks and environmental impacts. Meteorological conditions such as wind speed, humidity, and temperature affect dust emissions per unit activity level through various mechanisms, and these conditions typically exhibit cyclical variations. This study proposes a novel scheduling optimization model to reduce construction dust emissions based on variability in meteorological conditions. Unlike in previous studies, the segmented linear function is introduced to characterize the temporal dynamics of dust emission factors driven by meteorological fluctuations. The model minimizes dust emissions and project costs and is validated through two real-scale projects where emission factors are based on historical measurements. The results demonstrate significant emission reduction without increasing project duration and cost. Further sensitivity analyses reveal that increased cost, extended deadlines, flexible commencement time, or refined time-scale emission factors enhance mitigation effects. This paper can provide decision-making references for construction entities to reduce dust emissions through project scheduling and suggestions for the government to improve related policies such as taxation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction site; dust pollution; meteorological variability; project scheduling; public policy
Index terms: variability, duration, decision-making, scheduling, project scheduling, mitigation, taxation, dynamics, humidity, environmental impact, wind speed, pollution, particulate, project cost, construction activity, health risk, construction site, construction dust emission, variation, sensitivity analysis, public policy
Subjects: financial risk, statistical analysis, systems engineering, decision analysis, public policy, project controls, environmental hazards, environmental health, economics, policy economics, climate science, construction operations, environmental impact, operations research, contractual condition, work location, environmental science
Topics: Research Practice, Sustainability, Time Control, Risk Management, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Site Management, Governance, Regulations & Compliance
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here