Zheng, X; Hu, X; Wu, C; Li, Y and Yang, D (2025) Revisiting the relationships between governance mechanisms and project performance: Meta-analysis of main and moderating effects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(11): 04025164, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The findings of previous extensive explorations of the associations between two primary governance mechanisms—trust and contractual governance—and project performance in various domains within project management, including the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) sector, are considerably varied and occasionally contradictory. To gain more precise insights, this study used a meta-analysis to systematically integrate the impacts of governance mechanisms on project performance and examine the moderating effects of contextual (i.e., project type and national culture dimension) and methodological (i.e., measurement method and response rate) factors. It used data from 62 studies involving 14,169 samples. Main-effect results demonstrated that trust exerted a stronger positive effect on project performance than contractual governance. Moderation analyses showed that the impact of trust on project performance was stronger in collectivist cultures and samples with a high response rate; the contractual governance–project performance relationship was stronger in a high uncertainty-avoidance culture and when contractual governance was measured as a second-order construct. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of these two governance mechanisms was not moderated by project type. This study is a pioneering meta-analytic investigation focusing on governance mechanisms–project performance relationships while considering the moderating roles of contextual and methodological factors. It contributes significantly to the AEC project governance literature by reconciling previous inconsistencies in findings. Its results will guide both AEC and non-AEC project owners in selecting more-effective governance mechanisms by considering the cultural background of different contractors and in designing well-structured contracts to enhance project effectiveness.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual governance; meta-analysis; project performance; trust |
| Index terms: | governance, owner, investigation, project performance, effectiveness, national culture, project management, dimension, meta-analysis, exploration, measurement method |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, business, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management, project management theory and practice, performance management, research evaluation and metrics, sociology, environmental resource management, cross-cultural studies |
| Topics: | Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Quality Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Governance, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here