Lessons learnt from the use of relationship-based procurement methods in Australia: Clients' perspectives

Rahmani, F; Khalfan, M M A and Maqsood, T (2016) Lessons learnt from the use of relationship-based procurement methods in Australia: Clients' perspectives. Construction Economics and Building, 16(2), pp. 1-13. ISSN 2204-9029

Abstract

This paper aims to review the use of various construction procurement systems and present the development of Relationship-Based Procurement (RBP) Methods currently in use within the Australian construction industry. Therefore, this paper provides the historical development of procurement briefly and then focuses on the adoption of Relationship-Based Procurement (RBP) approaches in the Australian construction industry to investigate the future direction of the collaborative project procurement arrangements. Semi-structured interviews with high-level managers in the Australian state government organizations have been conducted to answer the research question. A discussion has been presented about the potential future tendency of the industry in adopting a RBP. The findings suggest that even though relationship based procurement systems offer significant benefits; they are not popular among the public sector decision makers because of inability to demonstrate Value for Money (VfM) propositions for public projects. Other reasons which may cause a move away from using RBPs in the future include the need for managers to fully engage throughout the project, and the lack of collaborative environment within the construction industry in general.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; relationship based procurement; procurement routes; construction clients
Index terms: historical development, collaborative project, construction procurement, interview, public project, manager, construction client, public sector, Australia, value-for-money, relationship-based procurement, construction industry
Subjects: contractual arrangements, industry analysis, administrative law, architectural and construction history, data collection methods, Geography, practitioner, evaluation, infrastructure engineering
Topics: Legal Issues, Value Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here