Forecasting state-level construction labor earnings for enhanced project cost control: An econometric and deep-learning analysis of the leading economic indicators

Shiha, A and El-adaway, I H (2025) Forecasting state-level construction labor earnings for enhanced project cost control: An econometric and deep-learning analysis of the leading economic indicators. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(12): 04025198, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

As a major input to several work packages, the labor element constitutes a critical component for successful performance of construction projects. Localized labor shortages, fundamental changes in prevailing wage laws, and historical shifts in the unionization rates of construction workers impair the adequate estimation of construction labor costs in diverse labor market dynamics. Meanwhile, existing studies have utilized national-level indicators to study the trends of construction labor costs, but the relationship between the multifaceted local economic factors and state-level construction labor costs remains understudied. This paper fills such a knowledge gap. A three-stage methodology is adopted: (1) data collection of state-level construction labor earnings and macroeconomic indicators as the target variable and predictors, respectively; (2) dimensionality reduction of the state-level macroeconomic indicators using principal component analysis (PCA), and identification of short- and long-term associations between the labor earnings and the macroeconomic indicators using Granger causality and the Johansen cointegration tests; and (3) prediction of the state-level labor earnings using vector error correction (VEC) and long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network models. The research methodology is demonstrated in the domain of 16 states in the US. Results indicate that in the Northeast states, labor earnings are linked to workforce size and participation rates. In the Midwest and South, inflation indicators consistently precede changes in construction worker earnings, whereas union representation is a reliable indicator of earnings in Illinois, Indiana, and West Virginia. The predictions revealed that multivariate LSTM captures the changes in labor earnings in the long-term forecasting horizons. This study can be replicated to augment the control of labor costs at other geographical domains. The developed multivariate prediction models provide owners and contractors with enhanced state-level estimating of construction labor costs, prescient cost planning in the tendering stage, and proactive control of schedules and budgets during execution.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: methodology, package, dynamics, labour cost, project cost, neural network, economic factor, principal component analysis, estimating, forecasting, cointegration, construction project, econometric, labour market, inflation, owner, economic indicator, construction worker, cost planning, research methodology, labour shortage, prediction model, construction labour, estimation
Subjects: sociology, systems engineering, artificial intelligence, management, economic analysis, prediction and forecasting, production management, data analysis and analytics, research design and methodology, research methods, economic concepts, financial management, practitioner, economics, financial and cost management, statistical analysis, cost management, contractual arrangements
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Site Management, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here