Readiness of urban design projects for integration with big data. Case study: Humanizing neighborhoods initiative—KSA

El Samaty, H S (2025) Readiness of urban design projects for integration with big data. Case study: Humanizing neighborhoods initiative—KSA. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(4), pp. 943-959. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

The research aims at finding out the extent to which such urban transformation projects—in terms of their design components and aspects—contribute to providing big data (BD) with effective datasets, which are considered a key requirement in operating smart city solutions. The present research investigates the predisposition level of these projects for supporting the BD through one of the urban initiatives for humanizing neighborhoods in Al Riyadh city (KSA). The selected case is analyzed by mapping the functional performance of its design features with certain characteristics of BD. One of the core conclusions is: Despite the readiness of the design components of these projects to provide high levels of integration with IoT and smart transformation, the level of application is lower than expected on account of the dearth of initial targets and strategies, especially the lack of a supporting environment, street facilities and security and safety datasets. The answer—arrived at through both descriptive and analytical approaches—is expected to guide those who query the further key concept of smart applications—is the answer characterized as technologically based, or is the same based on human aspects?

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: big data; humanizing projects; public places; smart city; smart transformation; urban data
Index terms: dataset, mapping, smart city, big data, integration, urban design, case study, transformation, strategy
Subjects: information systems, management, organizational analysis, data management, urban sustainability, data collection methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, urban design, business
Topics: Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here