Hong, Z; Hong, Y; Cai, H; Abraham, D M; Zhang, J and Dunston, P S (2025) BIM-based framework for in-plant quality control of precast concrete manufacturing. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(12): 05025017, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Precast concrete (PC) elements bring benefits such as high quality and shortened lane closures to transportation infrastructure construction. However, quality deficiencies during in-plant manufacturing can undermine the expected benefits and lead to excessive repair and maintenance costs. Current quality control (QC) practice relies heavily on manual and sporadic inspections, which are time consuming and error prone. Additionally, the paper-based documentation practice isolates quality management within each project lifecycle stage. Prior studies have explored building information modeling (BIM) for autonomous and intelligent quality assessment in precast manufacturing. However, a mechanism for sharing the QC data between/among in-plant activities and subsequent lifecycle stages is lacking. This study introduces a BIM-based dynamic QC framework for in-plant quality management of precast transportation infrastructure elements. An expandable BIM is developed to incorporate additional attributes as the project progresses, facilitating the accumulation of quality data from various QC activities. An Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) template is created to implement the expandable BIM and store the accumulated quality data through IFC extension. As a nonproprietary BIM data format, IFC provides seamless interoperability between different BIM software and enables across-stage data sharing. A case study of precast mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls is conducted to demonstrate the viability of the newly designed QC framework. The results show that the designed IFC template can store the QC data generated in the precast manufacturing process, thus enabling an expandable BIM for data accumulation and sharing with subsequent lifecycle stages. The resulting IFC template can overcome the interoperability challenge and can be directly adopted by precast plants where BIM has been implemented. This framework aligns with the global trends of construction digitalization and Construction 4.0 by enabling holistic quality management for precast transportation projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; industry foundation classes; precast concrete; precast manufacturing; quality control; transportation infrastructure |
| Index terms: | quality assessment, transportation project, documentation, digitalization, repair, manufacturing process, project lifecycle, inspection, building information modelling, construction 4.0, case study, quality control, quality management, maintenance cost, interoperability, industry foundation classes, transportation infrastructure, lifecycle, precast concrete |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, project delivery, building materials, professional development, financial management, infrastructure and transport systems, systems and processes, information systems, computational design, project completion, digital engineering, digital technology, manufacturing engineering, maintenance engineering, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here