Eaves, S; Gyi, D and Gibb, A (2014) Construction workers' views on workplace design and 'healthy' ageing. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
With the recent abolishment of a retirement age we are seeing an increase in an ageing workforce. This can often be difficult to manage, particularly in tough working environments such as the construction industry. Construction and building trades are well known for being tough, heavy and manually challenging, which can prove difficult for the older worker to remain healthy in whilst also exacerbating the decline in physical ability seen in the ageing population. Construction workers are often faced with cold, dark, poorly ventilated working environments however, some organisations working in areas such as maintenance provide somewhat less harsh conditions, often with a slower pace of work in comparison to the building trades and industrial work. In this paper, findings from interviews with 74 construction workers will be presented. Workers came from a small maintenance facility, a medium-sized domestic new-build company and a large civil engineering company. In-depth semi structured interviews took place with participants aged from 18 to over 50 in their place of work, incorporating the Stage of Change questionnaire, Nordic Musculoskeletal questionnaire and the Work Ability Index. In this paper comparisons are made between working practices, cultures and attitudes in these three organisations. The aim of this research is to provide direction for better work place design using the experience, knowledge and ideas of construction workers by encouraging healthy ageing in the industry, facilitating healthier working behaviours and enabling positive change.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ageing; culture; ergonomics; organisation |
| Index terms: | building trade, construction industry, construction worker, ageing population, questionnaire, workplace design, ergonomics, working practice, interview |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, design practice, management, industry analysis, demography, occupational health and safety management |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here