New hybrid models integrating the firefly optimization algorithm with the artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to improve estimation at completion

Mhady, A A; Gürgün, A P; Budayan, C and Koc, K (2025) New hybrid models integrating the firefly optimization algorithm with the artificial neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems to improve estimation at completion. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(11): 04025160, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the construction industry, project performance often faces challenges due to the unpredictable nature of operational environments, causing construction projects to frequently exceed their estimated initial budget. Construction companies must adopt a vigilant approach that continuously monitors construction project costs and promptly identifies and corrects discrepancies to maintain profitability. Estimation at Completion (EAC), which projects the total cost of a project at completion, is a crucial tool for managers to use to monitor project performance and mitigate associated risks. However, existing methods for predicting the EAC are criticized for their low accuracy. This highlights the need for new methods to improve the accuracy of EAC projections. The primary objective of this research is to create a vigorous artificial intelligence model that reliably predicts the final project cost based on the actual data obtained throughout the project's lifecycle. To achieve this, this study proposes new models that integrate Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS) with the Firefly Optimization Algorithm (FFA). The major objectives of the proposed model are to reveal the most significant factors influencing the EAC and to enhance its prediction accuracy by utilizing fewer input parameters. The proposed models were developed using a historical data set comprising 306 construction projects completed between 2000 and 2007 in Taiwan. The findings illustrate that the FFA-ANN model outperforms the FFA-ANFIS and traditional standalone models in terms of prediction accuracy. Overall, this study demonstrates that using the FFA algorithm for parameter selection significantly enhances the performance of both the ANN and ANFIS models, offering a promising approach to improving cost estimation in construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems; artificial intelligence; artificial neural networks; construction projects; estimate at completion; firefly optimization algorithm; machine learning
Index terms: manager, Taiwan, fuzzy inference, cost estimating, face, project cost, accuracy, construction company, artificial neural network, optimization algorithm, construction project, machine learning, estimation, profitability, lifecycle, project performance, construction industry, estimate, artificial intelligence
Subjects: production management, Geography, algorithms, decision-making and optimization, practitioner, organization, economic analysis, psychology, professional development, project management theory and practice, economics, industry analysis, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, project delivery, modelling and simulation
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here