Safety analysis and localization of scaffold joints using uav-acquired images

Paik, S; Kim, J; Kim, Y and Kim, H (2025) Safety analysis and localization of scaffold joints using uav-acquired images. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(12): 04025194, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A scaffold is one of the structures that causes many casualties at construction sites, so it must be monitored frequently. However, since scaffold monitoring is currently performed through visual inspection, it is time-consuming and costly. In particular, scaffold joints are difficult to monitor frequently due to their small size and large number. For efficient joint monitoring, this study proposes an automated monitoring method using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The proposed method consists of three stages: (1) detecting joints in UAV-acquired images using a deep learning-based object detection algorithm, and identify and match detections of the same joint using point clouds generated by simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM); (2) analyzing the installation status of the joint using a rule-based classifier based on the geometric characteristics of the detected components; and (3) estimating the joint locations from the SLAM point cloud and visualizing the results in a joint status map. As a result, the proposed method achieved a 100% recall and a 74.8% F1 score in classifying unsafe joints. Additionally, the locations of the joints were estimated with an accuracy of 98.4%. The experimental results confirm that the proposed approach can be effectively utilized for monitoring scaffold joints. The contributions of this study lie in proposing the first UAV-based method for monitoring scaffold joints, designing a classifier for automatically analyzing their installation status, and constructing a data set from various construction sites for detecting joints and their components.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: monitoring, localization, unmanned aerial vehicle, deep learning, mapping, estimating, object detection, construction site, point cloud, visual inspection, accuracy
Subjects: urban planning, professional practice, spatial and geospatial analysis, computer vision, automation and robotics, digital design, work location, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, control systems, professional development
Topics: Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Governance, Digital Applications, Site Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here