Tu, J; Xu, J and Deng, X (2025) Influencing factors of construction industry professionals' trustworthiness based on grounded theory. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 151(12): 04025206, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Trust is critical in the construction industry, facilitating project execution and long-lasting stakeholder relationships. Identifying trustworthy professionals is the key to enhancing trust in the construction industry. However, information asymmetry and global socioeconomic and technological changes pose challenges to professional trust. In China, as a transition economy, the institutional environment of professional trust is still not mature enough, which makes it vital to deeply understand the professional trust formation mechanism. Therefore, this study aims to systematically identify the factors influencing the trustworthiness of professionals in the construction industry, and to explore the mechanism by which these factors work together to enhance trustworthiness. Semistructured interviews with 20 professionals were conducted to collect data to support the theoretical findings based on grounded theory, and a questionnaire with 173 responses was used as a verification. Thirty-seven influencing factors categorized into nine categories across three dimensions were identified, namely, professional status composed of professional background, professional accumulation, and social reputation; working performance composed of working effectiveness, working ability, and working attitude; and personal characteristics composed of communication ability, personality, and professionalism. Then a theoretical model was established to explain the formation mechanism of professionals' trustworthiness and the relationship among the three dimensions and the nine categories. Theoretically, this study offers a systematic perspective on the formation of professionals' trustworthiness, providing a more comprehensive identification of influencing factors and deeper insights into how these factors interact and evolve dynamically to shape trust in professionals. Practically, this study offers guidelines for professionals, professional organizations, employers, educational institutions, and governments to enhance trust in the construction industry, and for a comprehensive trust-enhancing digital strategy to continuously improve the professional trust level in the construction market. By focusing on China, this study also contributes a regional perspective to the global discourse on professional trust.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | grounded theory; influencing factors; professionals; trustworthiness |
| Index terms: | influencing factor, questionnaire, China, strategy, grounded theory, construction industry, effectiveness, construction market, personality, transition economy, dimension, interview, professionalism, technological change, information asymmetry |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, performance management, management, data collection methods, professional development, innovation studies, Geography, transaction economics, health monitoring assessment and metrics, behavioral psychology, theoretical framing, market analysis, economic development, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, International Construction, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here