Improving information requirements management in complex rail transport projects

Chen, Yu (2024) Improving information requirements management in complex rail transport projects. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

The infrastructure construction industry is undergoing a digital transformation, shifting from traditional engineering practices and services to new digital and model-based approaches. Digital engineering is widely regarded as a significant enabler of this digitisation trend. Throughout the digital delivery of transport infrastructure, the elicitation, specification, implementation and verification and validation of the asset information requirements to support the development of the physical and digital assets are crucial to establishing the golden thread and harmonising data in support of the digital twin. High levels of integration in complex project environments present significant challenges for traditional requirements management practices. Existing approaches to requirements management in the rail transport sector lack a whole-of-system and whole-of-life methodology and have lower levels of maturity regarding the traceability and management of both physical system and asset information requirements, impacting effective and efficient creation of a digital twin. To address this gap, this thesis implemented a design science research methodology to explore the improvement of asset information requirements management capability in the rail transport sector in three cycles: relevance cycle, rigour cycleand design cycle.In the relevance cycle, a systematic and cross-domain literature review was conducted to better understand requirements management capabilities, initiatives and challenges in digital delivery across similar domains. As a result, 22 requirements management capabilities were identified, covering process, technologyand peoplerelated areas. Initiatives and methods used across different domains were analysed. Finally, challenges in requirements management were identified and categorised into the same areas as capabilities.In the rigour cycle, a multiple-case study was undertaken to investigate the contemporary requirements management practices in Australian transport projects. Key requirements management capabilities, initiatives in real projects, and challenges to requirements management practices were identified. A deeper investigation was conducted focusing on the status of requirements management and digital engineering standards, the maturity levels of requirements management practices, and the significance of challenges in the complex infrastructure sector.In the design cycle, a Capability Improvement Framework was developed based on findings from earlier research steps and then revised according to feedback from professionals in the industry. This framework had four maturity levels and identified 82 information requirements management activities across seven project stages. Each activity is linked to one or more information requirements management capability areas. This framework can be used at the organisational and project levels to assess capability maturity and provide a basis for potential improvements.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Jupp, Julie Rose and Sankaran, Shankar
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; design science; digital twin; feedback; infrastructure construction; integration; specification; standards
Index terms: case study, maturity level, transformation, investigation, requirements management, complex project, implementation, specification, design science research, traceability, literature review, transport infrastructure, science, validation, integration, methodology, digital twin, infrastructure sector, infrastructure construction
Subjects: research methods, evaluation, digital engineering, specialized education, strategic project management, contractual arrangements, civil engineering, design practice, professional development, contractual condition, organizational analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, business, data collection methods, supplier oversight, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Engineering Principles, Project Management, Procurement, Supply Chain Management, Education, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here