Learning in contract work: An actor-network theory study of the solar photovoltaic industry

Nguyen, Anne (2024) Learning in contract work: An actor-network theory study of the solar photovoltaic industry. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

With the extensive prevalence of contract work and the intense demand for solar energy, understanding the relations between learning and contract work is vital for addressing dynamic and unanticipated challenges emerging in everyday practice. However, much of the existing research on learning and contract work explores learning as individual acquisition or sociocultural participation. Few studies have investigated learning as enacted in practice; far fewer still have paid attention to learning in electrical contract work in the solar PV industry. Recent research in workplace learning has adopted practice-based approaches, including actor-network theory (ANT), to reconceptualise learning as emergence. Through the ANT empirical lens, this research's innovative conceptual and methodological framework scrutinises everyday contract work by following a multitude of human and nonhuman actors, both significant and seemingly mundane, enacted as distributed network effects to generate a substantial dataset. Based upon the evidence from 12 solar installations, four solar electrical contractors, 303 hours of observations, 24 interviews, and document review, this thesis contributes new knowledge on learning as emergence in practice.In so doing, the study critically examines contracts, contracting practices and installing practices, to address the central research question, "How is learning in contract work enacted in solar PV installations?", and two subordinate questions, "How are contracts enacted in practice?" and "How is learning enacted in solar PV installing practices?" On the first subordinate question, the study found that contracts unfold as both matters of fact and matters of concern, and five salient contracting practices enacted the contract. On the second subordinate question, the evidence indicated that learning is enacted in different connection efforts in re-forming, mutating, and persisting networks. To answer the central research question, this thesis argues that learning is enacted as crafting-forward in contract work. This novel conceptualisation has three components: 1) entwined contracting and installing practices oriented towards completing the current contract, building reputation, and fostering future referrals, 2) four conditions of learning in contracting practices, attuning to contracts as matters of fact and matters of concern, that they a) matter, b) are liked, c) are populated, and d) are durable, and 3) learning in tinkering in installing practices, enacted in different connection efforts in re-forming, mutating, and persisting networks. This research contributes an empirical study that attunes closely to the dynamics of everyday work and contributes new conceptualisations that are of interest to researchers, solar installers, individual contractors, and organisations working with and for contractors.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Hopwood, Nick and Reich, Ann
Uncontrolled Keywords: actor-network theory; emergence; learning; participation
Index terms: workplace learning, actor-network theory, dynamics, acquisition, solar energy, photovoltaic, empirical study, dataset, emergence, referral, evidence, installer, interview
Subjects: energy systems, data management, practitioner, business, theoretical framing, systems engineering, research methods, evaluation and assessment methods, professional development, data collection methods
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Education, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here