Li, Chenyang (2022) A model for developing retrofitting strategies for office buildings. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
A considerable amount of material, water, energy and other natural resources are invested in the building sector. The poor performance in energy efficiency of most existing buildings and the relatively low rate of new and more efficient construction means that it will be a long time before new buildings with better performance can replace existing poor building stock. Compared to demolition and construction of new buildings, retrofitting of existing buildings may be a faster method to modernise the existing stock and mitigate unfavourable impacts on the natural environment from the building sector. However, most existing sustainability assessment methods and decision-making frameworks focus on the environmental and economic performance of buildings without much consideration of the social dimension. While retrofitting may be the best chance for existing buildings to achieve sustainability, it is necessary to consider all three sustainability dimensions when retrofitting existing buildings to achieve economic growth, protect the natural environment, and increase social wellbeing.This study develops a model for deciding retrofitting strategies for office buildings to improve their sustainability performance. Different with most other existing decision-making models for retrofitting strategies which only consider the environmental and economic dimensions, the model developed in this study integrates all the environmental, economic and social dimensions into the decision-making process of retrofitting strategies. The retrofitting strategies developed by the model can maximise improvement of existing buildings in these three dimensions within project constraints and meet retrofitting goals at the same time. This is realised via a process from conceptualisation to operationalisation. First, a conceptual model for deciding retrofitting strategies for office buildings from a triple-bottom line perspective is developed based on literature review. Then, the conceptual model is converted to an operating model to suit local situations for sustainable retrofitting. A survey and focus group discussions are conducted to collect opinions about locally suitable retrofitting activities and assessment criteria from professionals in the construction and property management sectors as well as the key stakeholders of retrofitting. Finally, a case study is conducted in which the operating model is used to develop retrofitting strategies for the case building. With suitable potential retrofitting strategies developed for the case building, the validity of the conceptual model is verified. Meanwhile, the case study illustrates the process of quantifying and using the conceptual model to develop retrofitting strategies for an office building.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ding, Grace |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building stock; case study; economic growth; energy efficiency; focus group; natural resources; property management; sustainability; wellbeing |
| Index terms: | building stock, dimension, sustainability performance, validity, literature review, case study, well-being, strategy, survey, retrofitting, project constraint, natural resource, decision-making process, office building, decision-making, economic growth, sustainability assessment, property management, focus group, energy efficiency |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, construction type, renovation and retrofit, management, real estate economics, evaluation and assessment methods, sustainability and energy, sustainability assessment, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, asset management, control systems, economic development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, mental health and wellbeing, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Project Management, Health and Safety, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here