Physics-guided machine learning for condition assessment of building structures in operational environments

Zhang, Xutong (2025) Physics-guided machine learning for condition assessment of building structures in operational environments. PhD thesis, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.

Abstract

Structural condition assessment is critical for ensuring the safety and functionality of building structures, yet existing methods face significant challenges, including data scarcity, noise contamination, and limited generalisation across diverse operational environments. Traditional machine learning-based approaches often rely on extensive labelled datasets and assume consistent data distributions, which are impractical in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, these methods frequently lack interpretability, limiting their adaptation to practical applications. To address these issues, advanced frameworks are required to enhance accuracy, robustness, and scalability in structural damage detection and condition assessment.A series of physics-guided machine learning frameworks are developed in this research to overcome these above-mentioned challenges, mainly including transfer learning and physics-informed machine learning. Transfer learning methods leverage simulated frequency response function (FRF) data to pre-train deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and fine-tune them using limited real-world measurements, significantly improving damage localisation and severity identification. Additionally, a Joint Maximum Discrepancy and Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation (JMDAD) framework is developed to eliminate the need for labelled target data. By aligning feature distributions at both domain and class levels and leveraging transmissibility functions, this approach enhances robustness against noise and environmental variations while effectively detecting damage in real structures.Physics-informed machine learning methods further embed physical constraints into machine learning models to improve interpretability and reliability. The Parallel Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (PNODEs) framework integrates state-space equations to provide physical constraints, enabling accurate damage quantification and enhanced model reliability. Additionally, the Temporal-Spatial Neural Operator (PhySTN) framework combines a spatial feature mapping encoder with a physics-informed time operator to enable structural parameter identification and response reconstruction from sparse sensor data, addressing challenges in data insufficiency.The proposed frameworks are validated through extensive numerical simulations and experimental studies, including nonlinear numerical models, experimental structures, benchmark frames, and real-world applications. These methods demonstrate significant improvements in damage detection accuracy, scalability, and interpretability, offering reliable and efficient solutions for structural health monitoring. By addressing the challenges of insufficient data and enhancing the explainability of machine learning-based condition assessment, this research contributes valuable advancements to the field.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Zhu, Xinqun and Li, Jianchun
Uncontrolled Keywords: accuracy; learning; machine learning; monitoring; noise; quantification; reliability; safety; variations
Index terms: quantification, reconstruction, numerical model, parameter identification, adaptation, numerical simulation, contamination, monitoring, localization, sensor data, data-distribution, neural network, face, functionality, experiment, accuracy, variation, mapping, machine learning, dataset
Subjects: urban planning, psychology, design features, research products and data, user focus, building construction, spatial and geospatial analysis, data analysis and analytics, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, control systems, data collection methods, environmental health, data management, measurement and scaling, contractual condition, professional development, data exchange
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Contract Administration, Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Governance, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here