Design for smart maintenance enabled by BIM and IoT

Fialho, Beatriz Campos (2021) Design for smart maintenance enabled by BIM and IoT. PhD thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

Building Design Process management plays a strategic role in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry concerned with business performance, users comfort and satisfaction, and sustainable use of natural resources over buildings lifecycles. Of particular importance are the Reactive Maintenance (RM) services performed within the longest and costly phase of Operation and Maintenance (O&M). RM is characterized by delays, waste, and difficulties in service prioritization and identification of root causes of failures, impacting on critical problems attendance and users experience. Such inefficiencies are mainly related to the management of asset information and communication and hamper the generation and access to accurate information over a lifecycle. Recently, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), such as Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) have been applied to Facilities Management (FM) activities, showing potential for predictive and sustainable practices. However, the literature lacks scientific and empirical evidence regarding process requirements and impacts involved in their implementation in FM. In this respect, this research aimed at the development of a framework for BIM and IoT implementation in reactive maintenance services oriented to a predictive approach from the definition of three key objectives: (i) to characterize critical reactive maintenance problems and scenarios and opportunities for BIM and IoT implementation; (ii) to analyse and classify BIM and IoT solutions recently applied to FM and reactive maintenance services according to their benefits, gains, enablers, and barriers; and (iii) to characterize strategies and decisions involved in the planning, development, implementation, testing, and assessment of a BIM and IoT-based smart maintenance system and its impacts on the maintenance services and potential contributions to the design phase. The research was based on a pragmatic philosophy and a qualitative and quantitative mixed method design. Multiple Case Study and Prototyping were the research strategies, adopting university campuses as objects of investigation. Literature Review and Systematic Literature Review (SLR) supported the generation of theoretical data for the multiple case study and prototyping and discussion of the findings. Documental Analysis, Semi-structured Interviews, Focus Group, and Prototype development assisted the generation of empirical data on universities FM sector and RM services. Qualitative and Content Analyses were applied to qualitative data, whereas Statistical Analysis involved quantitative ones. Both research process and methodology contributed to knowledge gain. The study has provided a holistic approach of the topic through the clarification of circumstances in which maintenance services and FM sectors can benefit from BIM and IoT and identification of technological, procedural, and policy issues involved in their implementation. The research findings have evidenced a necessity for the identification of critical services and activities within organizations and standards, guidelines, and upskilling actions for an efficient data management between BIM and IoT systems and over a buildings lifecycle. They have also demonstrated the role of building performance information as an input for improvements in O&M and the initial design process stages. The thesis has addressed an agenda towards an innovative, sustainable, and efficient management of buildings, mitigating the environmental impacts of AEC industry and its contributions to climate change.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Fabricio, Márcio Minto and Codinhoto, Ricardo
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling; digital twin; facilities management; internet of things; predictive maintenance; reactive maintenance; university campus
Index terms: design phase, environmental impact, digital twin, methodology, data management, sustainable practice, climate change, building design, lifecycle, operation and maintenance, investigation, prototype, process management, business performance, testing, case study, philosophy, satisfaction, comfort, building performance, implementation, mixed method, natural resource, internet, interview, holistic approach, content analysis, evidence, design process, predictive maintenance, literature review, strategy, building information modelling, information and communication technology, statistical analysis, systematic literature review, focus group, facilities management, prototyping
Subjects: quality assurance, performance measurement, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, modelling and simulation, philosophical studies, research methods, sustainable practices, business, maintenance engineering, environmental resource management, climate science, design methods, contractual arrangements, professional practice, environmental impact, innovation and technology management, data collection methods, digital engineering, information systems, data management, evaluation and assessment methods, management, architectural design, data science, occupational health and safety management, research evaluation and metrics, computing systems
Topics: Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here