Hopkin, T; Lu, S L; Rogers, P and Sexton, M G (2014) Placing defects at the heart of high quality new homes: The learning perspective. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
The UK new-build housing sector is facing dual pressures to expand supply, whilst delivering against tougher planning and Building Regulation requirements; predominantly in the areas of sustainability. The sector is currently responding by significantly scaling up production and incorporating new technical solutions into new homes. This trajectory of up-scaling and technical innovation has been of research interest; but this research has primarily focus on the ÔupstreamÕ implications for house buildersÕ business models and standardised design templates. There has been little attention, though, to the potential ÔdownstreamÕ implications of the ramping up of supply and the introduction of new technologies for build quality and defects. This paper contributes to our understanding of the ÔdownstreamÕ implications through a synthesis of the current UK defect literature with respect to new-build housing. It is found that the prevailing emphasis in the literature is limited to the responsibility, pathology and statistical analysis of defects (and failures). The literature does not extend to how house builders individually and collectively, in practice, collect and learn from defects information. The paper concludes by describing an ongoing collaborative research programme with the National House Building Council (NHBC) to: (a) understand house buildersÕ localised defects analysis procedures, and their current knowledge feedback loops to inform risk management strategies; and, (b) building on this understanding, design and test action research interventions to develop new data capture, learning processes and systems to reduce targeted defects.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | action research; defects; house builders; new homes; risk management |
| Index terms: | placing, feedback loop, risk management, business model, heart, scaling, building regulation, new technology, action research, pathology, strategy, new-build housing, builder, programme, statistical analysis |
| Subjects: | regulatory law, project controls, economic development, management, concrete and cementitious materials, medical science and clinical practice, innovation and technology management, data science, control systems, practitioner, risk assessment, data collection methods, organization, business |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here