Direitinho, Romao Manuel Leitao Carrapato (2020) Civil construction waste (RCC) management model supported by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil.
Abstract
The main problem situations faced by cities, almost twenty years after the implementation of CONAMA Resolution No. 307/2002, which came to regulate the main stages of the management of RCC's, continue to be related to inadequate destinations of huge quantities produced of these residues. Much has been done since then to improve this type of situation in the country. However, most academic research on the subject almost always addresses this issue from a public, municipal perspective, which of course is different from the perspective of private builders, not least because there is a line of profit break to separate them. In this sense, more than a survey was concerned with developing computer tools to support the municipal management of RCC's. Contrary to what happens for private agents (construction companies). This thesis comes in some way to bridge this gap, with the development of two free programs (one based on the MMAD AHP), and an empirical mathematical model, which work together to try to optimize the management of RCC's produced on construction sites of vertical multifamily buildings, and to assist Brazilian private builders.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Marques Neto, Jose da Costa |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical hierarchy process; civil construction waste; construction sites; vertical civil construction |
| Index terms: | implementation, resolution, analytical hierarchy process, construction waste, agent, program, construction site, survey, construction company, builder, profit, mathematical model |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, practitioner, waste management, organization, conflict resolution, software systems, work location, mathematical modelling, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Site Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here