Life cycle management: Foundations for the application of circular economy in concrete industries of civil construction

Monteiro, Nathalie Barbosa Reis (2021) Life cycle management: Foundations for the application of circular economy in concrete industries of civil construction. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Brazil.

Abstract

The current economic model, inevitably, contains stages of natural resources' extraction, intermediate processing of this raw material, subsequent transformation into materials with different application, according to the society's real or magnified needs, and generation of residues. The growing demand for industrialized products causes, proportionally, an increase in the extraction of natural resources. Economic, social, and environmental factors point to the unsustainability of this linear economic model. The solutions presented are diverse, among them is the circular economy model. The concept of circular economy, although it is object of countless controversies, proposes the reuse of waste, within a productive chain, reducing losses, generating economic, social, and environmental gains. In the present research, a systematic analysis was carried out in the scientific literature, accompanied by visits to three crushed stone mining industries, located in the Monsenhor Gil, Piauí, Brazil, to assess the contribution of mining, in general and, particularly, the crushed stone mining, with the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and to analyze the existing environmental legislation for the sector, within the Brazilian Mining Law precepts. The visits aimed to follow the process of extraction, processing, and commercialization of the diabase mineral, from which the crushed stone used in the surveyed industries is produced. In addition, it was used the Life Cycle Assessment to evaluate, environmentally, construction products that use crushed stone as an input: concrete and poles. Based on the NBR ISO 14040 and 14044 standards, and on the EN 15978 e EN 15804 European standards the life cycle of this aggregate was evaluated within the productive chain of civil construction. Two kinds of industries were visited, within this sector, in Teresina, state of Piauí, Brazil: three concrete industries and four pole factories. The purpose of the visits was to monitor the production process of these materials, as well as to collect data through interviews with the managers. Questionnaires were prepared covering all the information necessary for the construction of the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), which aims to identify all the inputs and outputs of an enterprise. The universe of primary data includes water and energy consumption; description and quantity of machinery and equipment; description of production processes; quantity and type of produced waste; transport and distance traveled from the inputs to the factory and the product to the final consumer, among others. Secondary data were obtained from the scientific literature and specialized reports. Two methods of Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) were adopted: ReCiPe Midpoint (H) and CML (baseline), which were used together, or separately, according to the objective and scope of each analyzed products. The impact categories selection, for analysis, was also made according to the object under study and with the peculiar characteristics of each production process. In addition, sensitivity analyzes were conducted for both products (concrete and post), with the elaboration of different scenarios, with the alteration of parameters such as the reuse of waste and effluents, simulation of different distances traveled by the transport of inputs, replacement of active silica by sugarcane bagasse ash and reduction of the cement content in the concrete mixture, verifying the reduction of potential environmental impacts for both, concrete and poles, and the possibility of applying industrial symbiosis, for reuse of residues, based on Life Cycle Management (GCV). Thus, the study contributes to the mitigation of impacts generated by these industries once it was possible to establish soma guidelines for the change from the linear economy to an economy closer to the circular, in the civil construction sector that consumes crushed stone.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Silva, Elaine Aparecida da
Uncontrolled Keywords: life cycle management; crushed stone
Index terms: environmental impact, questionnaire, mitigation, environmental factor, construction sector, replacement, construction product, legislation, interview, manager, ISO, society, Brazil, life cycle assessment, life cycle management, production process, mining, energy consumption, sustainable development goal, foundations, inventory, life cycle impact assessment, concrete industry, aggregate, economic model, life cycle, natural resource, secondary data, transformation, circular economy
Subjects: economic analysis, legal systems, environmental science, environmental resource management, practitioner, materials science, environmental impact, communities and social development, financial risk, sustainable design, Geography, inventory management, structural engineering, manufacturing engineering, energy systems, standards development, modelling and simulation, value management, business, data collection methods, industry analysis, geotechnical engineering
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here