Mathematical modelling of embodied carbon emissions of building projects

Kibwami, N and Tutesigensi, A (2014) Mathematical modelling of embodied carbon emissions of building projects. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.

Abstract

It is increasingly recognised that if the emphasis remains on reducing operating carbon emissions (OC) of buildings, embodied carbon emissions (EC) will eventually attain a significant proportion of buildings' lifetime carbon emissions (LC). Emphasis on minimising EC is equally desirable if LC is to be reduced. A first step to minimising EC is quantification, in order to know what quantities to minimise. However, several prevalent approaches of quantifying EC pose challenges in promoting potential alternative actions to reduce EC. In many cases, besides the limitations associated with the boundaries usually adopted, it is difficult (if not impossible), to attribute the respective sources of energy (e.g. diesel, coal, biomass etc.) to the resulting EC. This paper presents a mathematical model for computing EC of building projects and in contrast to previous studies, a concept of disaggregation is adopted in order to identify EC with the respective energy sources. The approach enables the specific sources of energy to bear on the quantification of EC, in a manner that allows differentiation of the contribution of the different sources of energy. The model is presented in a series of mathematical equations. The major benefit associated with the nature of the developed model is that, even without recourse to material substitution (e.g. timber for concrete), it is possible to achieve emission reductions from the same material by optimising the parameters (e.g. energy used in manufacturing and transportation) associated with its EC.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: building projects; embodied carbon emissions; mathematical model
Index terms: embodied carbon, quantification, carbon emission, mathematical model, energy source, mathematical modelling, computing, disaggregation, differentiation, boundaries
Subjects: analytical methods, data science, property law, energy systems, climate science, computing systems, environmental impact, mathematical modelling, organization, measurement and scaling
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 CA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here